Vegamour — Google Ads

Ad Rank Improvement Plan

Campaign-by-campaign Quality Score diagnosis with specific fixes, keywords, and RSA copy to increase impression share. Budget isn't the bottleneck — ad rank is.

The Core Problem: 70-95% of Impressions Lost to Ad Rank

Branded Search Impression Share
10%
90% lost to rank
NB Search Avg Impression Share
12%
~85% lost to rank
Budget Utilization
35%
Budgets not the issue
Potential Unlocked Spend
$15K+/day
If rank issues fixed
Ad Rank = Max Bid x Quality Score x Extensions Impact. Since campaigns use tROAS (automated bidding), Google sets the bids. The levers we control are: (1) Quality Score — ad relevance, expected CTR, landing page experience, and (2) Ad Extensions — sitelinks, callouts, structured snippets. Fixing these lets Google bid higher automatically.
P0 — Biggest Revenue Opportunity

Branded Search USA

10% impression share | 90% lost to rank | $2,676/day on $3,000 budget | 4.28x ROAS

Current Quality Scores

Ad Group / KeywordQSAd RelevanceExpected CTRLanding Page
"vegamour" [EXACT]10Above AvgAbove AvgAbove Avg
"vegamour gro hair serum" [EXACT]9AverageAbove AvgAbove Avg
"vegalash volumizing serum" [BROAD]8Below AvgAbove AvgAbove Avg
"vegamour gro revitalizing shampoo" [EXACT]7AverageAbove AvgAverage
"vegalash" [BROAD]7AverageAbove AvgAverage
"vegamour gro brow serum" [EXACT]7AverageAbove AvgAverage
Why 10% impression share with QS 7-10? Quality Scores look good, so the rank loss is almost certainly a bid problem. The tROAS target (3.5x) is forcing Google to bid conservatively — it would rather skip an auction than win it at below 3.5x return. Branded keywords have near-100% intent, so lowering the tROAS target lets Google bid more aggressively on these high-converting searches.

Fixes (Rank Recovery)

Expected impact: tROAS drop from 3.5x → 2.5x alone could increase branded spend from $2,676/day to $5,000-8,000/day while maintaining 2.5x+ ROAS. That's an extra $2,000-5,000/day in brand revenue at highly profitable margins. Combined with the RSA and keyword fixes, targeting 40-60% impression share within 2-3 weeks.
P0 — Highest NB Spend, Low Quality Scores

NB Exact USA (US_Mid_C_Combo_Search-NB-Exact)

27.5% impression share | 72.5% lost to rank | $174/day | 0.63x ROAS (standard) | tROAS 2.0x

Current Quality Scores — The Problem

Ad Group / KeywordQSAd RelevanceExpected CTRLanding Page
"Hair Growth Serum" [EXACT]5Above AvgBelow AvgAverage
"products for hair loss treatment" [BROAD]
"scalp serum" [EXACT]
QS 5 is a major red flag for the highest-spend NB keyword. Expected CTR is BELOW AVERAGE — meaning Google thinks your ads will get clicked less than competitors. Landing page is AVERAGE — not specific to serums. Both of these are dragging down rank and inflating CPCs.

Fixes

P0 — Quality Score 3 (Critical)

NB Lash Search (US_Mid_C_LashBrow_Search-NB-Lash)

26.2% impression share | 73.8% lost to rank | $213/day

Current Quality Scores — Critical

Ad Group / KeywordQSAd RelevanceExpected CTRLanding Page
"lash serum without prostaglandin" [EXACT]3Above AvgBelow AvgBelow Avg
"eyelash growth serum that works" [EXACT]3Above AvgBelow AvgBelow Avg
QS 3 is dangerously low. Two components are BELOW AVERAGE: Expected CTR and Landing Page. This means (1) the current ads aren't compelling enough to click, and (2) the landing page doesn't match the search intent well. This campaign is paying 50-100% more per click than a QS 7+ competitor for the same keywords.

Fixes

P0 — Quality Score 3 (Critical)

NB Brow Search (US_Mid_C_LashBrow_Search-NB-Brow)

~12% impression share | ~85% lost to rank | $213/day combined with Lash

Current Quality Scores — Critical

Ad Group / KeywordQSAd RelevanceExpected CTRLanding Page
"eyelash and brow serum" [PHRASE]3Above AvgBelow AvgBelow Avg

Fixes (same pattern as Lash)

P0 — Already Covered in NB Report

NB Hair Growth Serum

31.6% impression share | 68.4% lost to rank | $3/day

This campaign is already fully covered in the NB Optimization Report (vegamour-nb-optimization.melleka.app). The team is executing: new 15-headline RSA, 10 new PHRASE keywords, removal of 6 blocking negatives, landing page change to serum PDP, pause of dead AUTO ad group. No additional work needed here — it's the same fixes that improve rank.
P1 — New Campaign, Needs Time

Search | Competitor Conquesting ||

3.6% impression share | 95.1% lost to rank | $49/day

Current Quality Scores

Ad Group / KeywordQSAd RelevanceExpected CTRLanding Page
"prostaglandin free eyelash serum" [BROAD]5Above AvgBelow AvgAverage
"lash serum without prostaglandin" [BROAD]4AverageBelow AvgAverage
"nutrafol vs vegamour" [PHRASE]5Above AvgBelow AvgAverage
"minoxidil side effects" [BROAD]3Below AvgBelow AvgAverage
"rogaine for women side effects" [BROAD]3Below AvgBelow AvgAverage
QS 3-5 is expected for competitor conquesting — you're bidding on someone else's brand, so ad relevance and CTR will naturally be lower. The fix is landing page specificity and ad copy that directly addresses the competitive angle.

Fixes

P1 — New Campaign, Needs Time

Search | Problem-Aware ||

4.1% impression share | 94.6% lost to rank | $33/day

Status

Just imported from Google — all ads pending. This campaign targets people searching for hair loss problems who don't know about Vegamour yet. Expected CTR will naturally be low for problem-aware keywords. Give it 2 full weeks of data before making changes. The RSAs from the NB Optimization Report are already best-in-class for this intent.

Improvements for After the Learning Period

P1 — PMax Has Different Levers

PMax Campaigns (Shampoo Kits, Hair Serums)

PMax Shampoo: 14.9% share, 84.3% lost to rank | PMax Serums: 14.4% share, 80.8% lost to rank

PMax ad rank works differently than Search. There are no keywords or RSAs to optimize — PMax uses asset groups (images, videos, headlines, descriptions, audience signals). The rank improvements come from:

Fixes

P1 — Product Feed Optimization

NB Shopping USA

38.1% impression share | 61.9% lost to rank | $600/day (on shared $50 budget) | tROAS 1.5x

Fixes

Execution Checklist

Ordered by impact. Do these top to bottom.

Week 1 (Immediate)

Week 2

Week 3